Yâ Hâbib Yâ Sâhib al-Qadam

Current IssuesJanuary 2, 2009 6:02 pm

No matter how many times the scene is played on TV channels or Internet sites, one simply can’t get enough of it.

Every time I see Montadar Al Zaidi throw the pair of shoes at US President George W. Bush, I feel I need to pinch myself so as to make sure I’m not hallucinating, but then I realise it really happened.

An Arab journalist truly took his shoes off and threw them at the tyrant who was the cause of the death and misery of millions of Muslims.

This man who dragged his nation into a mindless war and brought down on them the scorn and hatred for generations to come.

The most amazing thing to me is that there is still anyone left in the Arab world who has it in him to stand alone and defy tyranny in any one of its forms and I think that is what made Al Zaidi’s actions produce such violent reactions in the Arab and Muslim world. His act spelled not only the bravery of individual action — for no one can deny his bravery — but it touched the much deeper wound which is the utter insignificance of the Arab states and the people they represent. We as a region have become invisible on the geopolitical map. If at all we are seen, it is as mere pawns in the hands of Western imperial powers and their desired dominance of other rising powers such as Russia or China.

Al Zaidi didn’t just throw the shoe at Bush but in a symbolic gesture he was throwing it at us, at our own failures and cravenness.

He threw it most of all at those who have made us what we are today - an inconsequential nation worth mentioning only for its shocking violence. We can only make headlines by our failures, defeats and deaths. Al Zaidi’s shoe went out as a scream of protest at the state at which we find ourselves - a people with no voice and no power.

If there is a gush of enthusiasm in the long-suffering Arab street for Al Zaidi’s shoe, it is because in Bush they see not only the man who destroyed Iraq but also a generic tyrant which could be any Arab leader and the minions that serve them.

They would have wished it to be directed at those who stripped us of all the means of strength and power leaving us pickings for the predator nations that divide us into colonies as in the case of Iraq or protectorates.

We are left with no possibility to defend ourselves or ability to demand our rights either within our own countries or in international forums such as the UN that has become just another tool in the hands of imperial powers.

After all who sits in the Security Council except those who have bigger guns?

So as much as it makes me happy and as proud as I’m of the few Arabs who still have it in them to stand up and say to the mighty, “No, I will not surrender,” it also makes my heart break that they are very few in number.

Where are all the Arab armies to defend us? Where are all the tanks, the missiles, the plans, and the entire arsenal that we have wasted our national wealth to acquire? Why aren’t our armies out there on the front fighting to protect us, to liberate us to save the starving and defend the weak? Why should we wait for a lone warrior to lob a grenade?

Why should a journalist abandon his greatest weapon, the pen, and choose to express our misery with such a dramatic act?

How many of us should die and suffer for the Arab nation to wake up and take its destiny in its own hands? Al Zaidi maybe one of the bravest men on this globe because not only did he defy and humiliate the emperor but also he knew very well what to expect at the hands of those who created Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo and all the other secret prisons in every dark corner of the earth. It is time that Arabs stopped 
to wait for those lone heroes who 
appear here and there, throwing
them like sacrificial offering to the powerful.

We have to take our own destiny in our hands and throw the proverbial shoe at all the tyrannies in our region, great and small.

Finally, on the matter of the cultural significance of throwing a shoe at someone in the Arab world. It has been said again and again that when one throws a shoe at some one in the Arab world, it has terrible meaning. I would like to ask what it would mean in other cultures. Let us assume an English journalist throws a shoe at the 
German chancellor.Would Angela Merkel take it to mean anything other than an insult? I think that throwing a shoe at some one’s face needs no translation.

Current IssuesApril 26, 2008 1:34 am

Dear Brothers, Sisters, Friends & Colleagues,

May the Peace and Blessings of God be Upon You.

London is one of the largest cities in the World with a Muslim population in excess of 800,000 people.

The stakes for Muslims in London could not be higher. Polls show Ken Livingstone and Boris Johnson almost neck and neck, it’s going to be a very close race. Every vote matters. Ken Livingstone, the current Mayor, has been a longstanding friend and champion of ethnic communities, diversity, dialogue and religious freedom. The contesting conservative candidate Mr Johnson, who was recently endorsed by the British National Party (BNP), has persistently expressed views undermining community cohesion and harmony by insulting minority communities and attacking Islam in the press and print media.

On May 1st some 300,000 eligible Muslim Londoners can exercise their democratic choice, this will undoubtedly be a historic and unique demonstration of our unity and representation, Insha’Allah.

The choice is clear. Make your voice heard.

The British Muslim Initiative and the Muslim Directory urges all Londoners not to split their vote and choose Ken Livingstone as their 1st Option on the ballot paper for Mayor on May 1st.

If you are in London then please pass this message on to your friends and family to get them to vote. If you are outside London, then forward this to any friends or family that you know of in London.

Ken Livingstone will be having a Question and Answer session in the Library at the Regent’s Park Mosque (Islamic Cultural Centre), 146 Park Road, London NW8 7RG at 5pm on Thursday 24th April 2008 - all welcome.

5 REASONS TO VOTE FOR KEN LIVINGSTONE Image and video hosting by TinyPic

  1. LONG-TIME SUPPORTER OF MUSLIMS; CAMPAIGNER AGAINST ISLAMOPHOBIA “The attack on Muslims threatens freedoms for all of us. Every person who values their right to follow the religion of their choice or none should stand with the Muslim communities today.” The Guardian, 20th November 2006

  2. SUPPORTS AND CELEBRATES DIVERSITY & MULTICULTURALISM IN LONDON “I am proud of London’s reputation as the most diverse city in the world where the contribution of all communities is celebrated”

  3. OPPOSED THE WAR IN IRAQ “It is evident that the war in Iraq was not justified. It has made the situation worse. The illusions with which it was launched are collapsing.”

  4. STAUNCH SUPPORTER OF THE RIGHTS OF THE PALESTINIANS “The hypocrisy towards the Palestinian people is breathtaking. Repeated United Nations resolutions against the illegal occupation of Palestinian lands are not implemented and horrendous crimes against innocent civilians are systematically ignored. Without justice for Palestine, there will be no lasting settlement in the Middle East.”

  5. CAMPAIGNER AGAINST RACISM “All racist and anti-Semitic attacks must be stamped out. However, the reality is that the great bulk of racist attacks in Europe today are on black people, Asians and Muslims - and they are the primary targets of the extreme right.”

5 REASONS NOT TO VOTE FOR BORIS JOHNSON Image and video hosting by TinyPic

  1. INSULTS ISLAM & MUSLIMS “To any non-Muslim reader of the Koran, Islamophobia seems a natural reaction.. . Judged purely on its scripture - to say nothing of what is preached in the mosques - it is the most viciously sectarian of all religions.” (Spectator 16th July 2005)

The proposed ban on incitement to “religious hatred” makes no sense unless it involves a ban on the Koran itself.” (Telegraph 21/07/2005)

“Islam will only be truly acculturated to our way of life when you could expect a Bradford audience to roll in the aisles at Monty Python’s Life of Mohammed.” (Telegraph 21/07/2005)

  1. HOLDS RACIST VIEWS Referred to black people as ‘picaninnies’ ‘with watermelon smiles’ (Daily Telegraph, 10/01/02)

In addition, the BNP have told their supporters to give him the 2nd vote on the Mayoral ballot paper - shows how close they think his policies are to them!

  1. FANATICALLY SUPPORTED THE WAR ON IRAQ & CAMPAIGNED FOR GEORGE W BUSH If we know the Pentagon, there must be a very good chance that this will be an outstandingly successful and stress-free war.”

  2. STAUNCH SUPPORTER OF ISRAEL “If I were an Israeli, I would be astounded that any member of the British Government or Opposition felt able to criticise Israel at all.” (The Telegraph, 03/08/2006)

“If we were Israelis… we would dispatch an American-built ground-assault helicopter and blow the place to bits. Then we would send in bulldozers to scraape over the remains, and we would do the same to all the other houses in the area… After decades of deranged attacks the Israelis have come to the conclusion that this is the best way to deter Palestinian families from nurturing these vipers in their bosoms, and also the best way of explaining to the death-hungry narcissists that they may get the 72 black-eyed virgins of scripture, but their family gets the bulldozer.” (The Spectator, 16th July 2005)

  1. MOCKS DIVERSITY & TOLERANCE “We must begin the re-Britannification of Britain”

Current IssuesSeptember 17, 2007 1:11 pm

 

A study has revealed that the miswak or teeth cleaning sticks used in Arab and Asian countries have greater value than toothbrush and toothpaste.

A group of dentists at King Saud University (KSU) has done a study revealing the medicinal properties of miswak, while miswak sales have gone up considerably in Ramadan this year.

The study suggests that the beneficial effects for oral hygiene and dental health for those who have been using miswak are equal to, if not greater than, those of a toothbrush and toothpaste.

“Miswak has many medicinal properties and can fight plaque, recession of gums, tooth wear, bleeding gums and periodontal pocket depths,” said the study, adding that the repeated process of using them releases fresh sap and silica (a hard glossy mineral), which acts as an abrasive material for the removal stains.

The study was conducted by a group of dentists led by Dr. Khaled Almas. The study explains that the miswak also releases a substance that soothes toothache. “It is also used to prevent smoking in adults and thumb sucking in children. It may also improve appetite and regulate peristaltic movements of the gastro-intestinal tract,” said the study.

Referring to the growing sales of miswak, especially during Ramadan this year, Mubarak Al-Oraizi, a miswak seller in Riyadh, said: “Miswak sales have gone up in Ramadan, especially in Makkah and Madinah by nearly 300 percent.”

Arif Aleem, a Bangladeshi salesman, who sits in front of a Riyadh mosque, said: “This is our season and we do brisk business in Ramadan every year. For me, it is fun sitting near the mosque, praying and talking to people, watching people coming and going and at the same time making money.”

Miracle Brush

History of Miswaak

A very touching Hadeeth narrated by our most respected and honorable mother of Mumineen, Hadrat ‘Aayesha Siddeeqah  about the very last minutes of the earthly sojourn of the Beloved of Allah, the most perfect of all humanity;  "One of the gifts among the gifts bestowed upon me by Allah ‘Azza Wa Jal is the apparent passing away (from this world) of my beloved husband  in my house during my turn to be with him  (when he was lying with his head) in between my collar bone and my ribs. It is also His gift that my saliva blended with his blessed saliva before his last breaths. (It so happened that) Hazrat Abdur Rahman Bin Abi Bakr came to my house and he had a miswaak in his hand. At that time I was supporting my beloved husband (his head between my collar bone and ribs). I saw him  looking at the miswaak. I knew his fondness for the miswaak. So, I asked him  do you want me to take the miswaak? (from Hadrat Abdur Rahman Bin Abi Bakr for you). He nodded his head in agreement. I took the miswaak from Hadrat Abdur Rahman Bin Abi Bakr and presented it (to my beloved husband ). He  wanted to use it but it was hard. (He  did not have the strength) Hence I asked "should I soften it for you?" He  nodded his head in agreement. I then chewed one end and (after softening it) presented it to him. He started to rub the miswaak over his (blessed) teeth. There was a utensil with water in it, in front of him . He  would put both his (blessed) hands in the water and apply it over his blessed face and recite "  " (There is no God (worthy of worship) but Allah) and say "Indeed there are hardships around death". He  would raise his hands in Dua and supplicate "O Allah (’Azza Wa Jal) include me among my highest friends (Prophets and Messengers)" and kept repeating it, till his  blessed soul was taken away and then his  blessed hands came down (to rest on or by his blessed body). (Kutub Katheerah)

My precious gems, every action every movement of the Beloved of my soul was for our benefit. No thought of his was free from love and concern for us. He is the greatest of all teachers. He taught not so much with words as with deeds. Alongwith reciting and making dua, the last act he performed as the strength was fading, was to clean his blessed teeth with the Miswaak.

When I read the above Hadeeth many many years ago Allah the Most Merciful moved my heart so profoundly that I resolved never to be without a Miswaak for the rest of my life. Whatever is dear to Allah is Dear to His Beloved and vice versa. In the heart of my hearts I knew that using Miswaak would endear me to my dearest Lord because His Beloved loved the Miswaak so, so much. I still carry the feeling, and its strength never wavers that weak and sinful as I am, I may falter in adopting the other difficult Sunnahs. The Merciful of all mercifuls may forgive my errors and shortcomings because of my love for the Miswaak and may just push me into Paradise because of it. Ameen.

I pray with all my heart that you my precious gems will be moved even more deeply than this humble slave was and adopt this magnificent yet simple blessed Sunnah for the rest of your lives and become endeared by the only One who matters and His most Beloved  and reach high levels in Paradise. Ameen.

 

Current IssuesJune 19, 2007 10:59 am

RUKSHANA Begum is, without question, one of a kind. This week, the 23-year-old will become the first police officer ever to wear the Muslim hijab, or headscarf, on duty in Cambridgeshire. And she can’t wait.

"I’ve struggled to get where I am," she admits. "But I feel that my generation is the one which is going to break barriers. I hope that people will look at me and think, ‘If she can do it, so can I’."

When they discovered she was planning to join the police force, Rukshana’s parents went mad. Such a thing was, she explains, unheard of for a young Muslim woman. But, aged just 19, Rukshana herself had no doubts about what she wanted to do.

"I’d always been interested in the police," she explains. "And while I was at Cambridge Regional College I studied public services. The more I learned, the more I thought ‘This is really good, I wouldn’t mind doing it myself ‘.

"When I left college and was applying to university, I decided I may as well apply for a job with the police too - keep my options open. But when the letter arrived, saying I’d passed the application stage, my sister opened it by mistake - we have the same initials.

"She showed my parents, and they were really shocked, mostly because I hadn’t mentioned it to them. They were disappointed, because they’ve always been very pro education and wanted me to continue my studies.

"But I didn’t want to give up on policing, so we came to a compromise:

I’d go to university and do a degree, like they wanted, but I’d also join the specials, so I could be a part of the police force in my spare time."

One of eight children, Rukshana stuck to her word. And, during her training, her parents seemed to come round to the idea. But when she started going out on duty, for four hours each and every week, her mum and dad quickly voiced their disapproval.

"I think their reservations had a lot to do with me being the first, it just wasn’t expected," she adds. "And it happened to coincide with a regular officer’s arm being slashed. That made them take a step back.

"My dad said ‘Are you sure you want to do this? There’s so much risk

* you could end up getting killed’. But the way I see it, there’s risk in every job - my dad’s a taxi driver, and any weirdo could get into his cab. At least in the police you’re trained to deal with it."

Along with their fears for her safety, Rukshana thinks her parents had a negative perception of the British police. Hailing from Bangladesh, Rukshana’s family once had to call officers to their Cambridge home after a group of youths threw stones at their window.

"The police came but said they couldn’t do anything, and my dad took it quite personally," she explains.

"Whatever the police force might have been like in the past, I’ve found it to be very inclusive."

Despite her family’s reservations, Rukshana was determined to carry on policing - and even resorted to keeping some of her shifts a secret.

"One of the reasons I didn’t want to stop, despite the pressure from family, was how welcoming the force had been," she explains.

"They really look after you. And whenever anything big’s going on, like a festival, they give me a ring and ask if I want to do it. That makes you feel really involved and appreciated."

Rukshana has just completed a degree in criminology at Anglia Ruskin. And she admits it’s not always been easy to fit in her shifts as a special.

"Once or twice I had to cancel a duty when family came over," she confesses. "They’d say ‘Is your daughter a police?’, like it was something shameful. It did wind me up. It’s such a respectable thing to do, it’s not like I was dossing in my spare time."

Since those early days, Rukshana’s family and friends have got used to her being a special. A handful of relations, thinking of signing up themselves have even asked for application forms.

Raised a devout Muslim, who learned how to pray and read the Qur’an at Cambridge’s Abu Bakar Siddiq Mosque on Mawson Road, Rukshana recently came to another big decision: from now on, she’s going to wear hijab - even when she’s on police duty.

"Our parents never forced us to wear it," explains Rukshana. "But I’m a practising Muslim: I pray, I read the Qur’an, I fast during Ramadan . . . I thought ‘If I can do all that, I want to take the next step forward to show my devotion to my faith’.

"And so I decided to wear a headscarf. You can’t cherry pick when and where to wear it. That would be hypocritical, wouldn’t it?"

Rukshana contacted Cambridgeshire Specials Co-ordinator Shahina Ahmed, herself a Muslim. At the time, last autumn, hijab was not issued as part of standard uniform. So the constabulary set about getting a scarf designed and made specially for Rukshana.

Sourcing various examples, from the few UK forces which provide hijab, they came up with the finished design earlier this year - with safety in mind. While most headscarves are held in place with pins, Rukshana’s is fastened with a strip of poppers.

Should an assailant grab her hijab, while on duty, it will simply pull apart. Made to order by a tailor in Yorkshire, from a special stretchy material, the scarves cost £15 each to buy.

"I think it’s a very positive thing," says Shahina. "The Chief Constable, Julie Spence, has been supportive from day one. But we did have some resistance from members of the force, asking ‘Do you want to put your officer at risk?’ I don’t see it that way


* people have to accept you for who you are."

After four years as a special (the only Muslim in her station), Rukshana has done everything from directing traffic to dealing with public disorder offences. And she’s never encountered any violence or racism.

"People have always looked at me and known I was from an ethnic minority," she explains.

"Wearing a headscarf will narrow down my identity - people will know I’m a Muslim.

"And I see that as a really positive thing; it feels right for me, and I’m not expecting any negative impact.

"Since 9/11, the whole terrorism thing, people think all Muslims must be members of al Qaeda. But my family is from Bangladesh, which is nowhere near the Middle East.

"Hopefully, when people see me out on the street in my police uniform, it will make them think again."

Supporting her choice

RUKSHANA’S move to wear hijab has received the backing of Cambridgeshire Constabulary’s top brass.

"Our staff represent the many communities we serve, and we respect and always try to accommodate any adaptation staff with particular beliefs may want to make to their uniform," says Deputy Chief Constable John Feavyour.

"Uniform is obviously there to serve a purpose in terms of identity and safety, and all changes to uniform are made in line with guidelines that ensure the officer or staff member is able to conduct their normal policing or other duties safely and effectively."

Her efforts have also been welcomed by the wider Muslim community in Cambridge. Abdul Arain is coordinator of Cambridge Muslims Online and a leading member of the Abu Bakar Siddiq Mosque on Mawson Road in the city. He says: "Muslims in the UK are active supporters of and instigators in the positive progress of British society.

They should be able to fully integrate with every section of that society, including the armed forces, the police force and all the other institutions which exist. So this is definitely a step in the right direction."

Father is proud of policing career choice

RUKSHANA’S father, Asgor Ali, has told the Newshow much he admires his daughter’s determination.

"I am a very proud father," he says. "I wasn’t sure to start with, I’ll admit that. You only have to look at a newspaper or turn on the TV to hear about incidents involving police officers, so that was on my mind.

"But an officer from the force came to visit me in my home to explain more about the job, and now I’m pretty happy with what Rukshana is doing.

"She’s the only police officer in Cambridgeshire wearing a hijab, and I’m very happy she’s chosen to wear it. It’s very much in our religion. I think it’s a very positive thing.

"Rukshana is a very strong character and very determined - she said ‘Yes, this is what I want to do’ and she stuck to it. I’m very happy she wants to do something with her life.

"I know she’ll be dealing with all sorts of people, sometimes good and sometimes not. But life is about challenges, isn’t it?"

Forces gear up for hijab wearers

AT THE moment, Rukshana is very much in the minority - among both regular and special police officers. A spokesman for the national Police Federation says it is almost impossible to quantify the number of Muslims nationwide who elect to wear hijab on duty, because it is very much a personal choice and, as yet, the headscarf isn’t issued as uniform across many forces.

Ibrar Hamed, of the Association of Muslim Police in London, says the Met are currently in the process of introducing hijab as a standard uniform option.

While Rukshana will wear a protective bowler hat on top of her hijab when necessary, to protect her head from potential blows, the Met’s aim is to provide a special skull cap instead, which can slot under the scarf.

"In brief, the policy states there is a need to risk assess the officer’s tasking," adds Ibrar. "If the risk assessment indicates a bowler hat would normally be required, then the officer can obtain a protective insert for her hijab from clothing stores.

She should not normally be forced to wear a bowler hat over her hijab but has the choice to do so."

Current IssuesMay 29, 2007 8:14 pm

One of the leading Islamic calligraphers Khalil al-Zahawi has been shot dead outside his home in the New Baghdad District. Al-Zahawi (May God have mercy upon his soul) was highly regarded in the Ummah for his classical Arabic script.If we are to look back into our History books, which unfortunately our Masjids do not tend teach, it can be seen that Baghdad had played an important role in the emergence of the Islamic Golden age.

Under the Command of Khalid Ibn Waleed, the newly created Islamic Empire moved into the region of Iraq. By about 762 A.D., the Abbasid dynasty took over rule of the vast Muslim world and moved the capital to the newly founded city of Baghdad, which over the next 5 centuries had made Baghdad into the world’s centre of education and culture. Baghdad now has become the world’s centre of death and destruction due to the war launched for the sake of the most brutal racist state of Israel.

It was in Baghdad where the Islamic Scholars contributed to the subjects of medicine, mathematics, astronomy, chemistry, literature, and more.

Also including that the worlds leading Islamic Scholars had their educational roots in Baghdad. One of the most famous centres of learning was Bayt al-Hikmah (the House of Wisdom) that had attracted scholars from all over the world from many cultures and religions. Here, teachers and students worked together to translate Greek manuscripts, preserving them for all time. They studied the works of Aristotle, Plato, Hippo crates, Euclid, and Pythagoras. The House of Wisdom was home to, among others, as well as the most famous mathematician of this period: Al-Khawarizmi, the "father" of algebra (which is named after his book "Kitab al-Jabr").

While Europe festered in the Dark Ages, Baghdad was thus at the heart of a vibrant and diverse civilization. It was known as the world’s richest and most intellectual city of that period, and was second in size only to Constantinople.
I ask the Muslim Community of Britain to do dua for Khalil al-Zahawi, his family and for the Muslim Ummah. We also ask you to come and join the Muslim communities and organisations, which were once filled with diversity, intellectuality and great values that are based upon the Quran and Sunnah.
We are more powerful together than we are apart.

Current IssuesMarch 26, 2007 11:08 am



A happy ending? As soon as Daniele Mastrogiacomo, the Italian journalist of the daily newspaper La Repubblica, kidnapped by the Taliban in Afghanistan two weeks ago, arrived home safely yesterday evening, a row started in Italy over the terms under which he was released: five Taliban terrorists freed immediately from prison, Ramhatullah Hanefi (the emergency mediator who conducted the negotiations to free Mastrogiacomo) arrested and unreachable, Aymal Naqshbandi, Mastrogiacomo’s interpreter, disappeared, probably transferred from the Taliban prisons to those of the secret services, and his driver, Sayed Agha, beheaded. When Agha’s wife, six months pregnant, heard of the horrible end of her husband, she suffered a miscarriage.

Italian media and politicians don’t seem to be paying much attention to all this horror: what’s important is that "our" journalist got home safely, hugging his wife and kids and colleagues with his thumbs up as soon as he landed in Italy. Italian public opinion is divided on whether it was a good idea to give in to the Talibans’ demands, because this might pave the way to future kidnappings, given that they now know that the Italian government will pay up.

The debate is about to shift to centre stage in parliament after the wounding yesterday of an Italian soldier in guerilla fire in western Afghanistan: should Italy withdraw its peace-keeping troups from Afghanistan? A poll by Ipr Marketing for La Repubblica today shows that 51% of Italians approve of the negotiation with the Taliban and 54% want peace talks with them.

Afghan journalists, meanwhile, are outraged that the Italian media is celebrating the freedom of Mastrogiacomo: is the life of an Afghan worth less than that of an Italian? Today’s Italian press - especially La Repubblica- is so full of excitement for the safe return of its own reporter it barely mentions the Afghans, counting them among the many "normal" casualties of international conflicts.

The exception is La Stampa’s Massimo Gramellini, whose Buongiorno column today is dedicated to the poor beheaded driver, who - after all - died while trying to make a living driving irresponsible journalists in dangerous places.

Mastrogiacomo himself didn’t say much about Agha’s sacrifice: in his first interviews he told of his horror at witnessing the beheading - not a horror born of pity, more worried that he would be next. Later he said that he was "convinced" that his interpreter would be released (where did this idea come from? Nobody seems interested in finding out), and that he felt that his driver sold him to the Taliban, therefore paying with his life for his ambiguous role. In the meantime, the Italian journalist has already made clear that he will not return in Afghanistan - too dangerous. Whose happy ending?

Current IssuesMarch 23, 2007 12:22 am

An Israeli Army dog attacks a Palestinian woman as soldiers carry out an army raid in the West Bank village of Al-Ubeidiya, near Bethlehem, on Wednesday. (AFP) RAMALLAH, West Bank, 23 March 2007 — It appears that the dog, which bit a Palestinian woman’s hand, during an Israeli invasion into Al-Ubeidiya village near Bethlehem on Wednesday, was “innocent,” according to the Israeli Army.

The Israeli Army spokesman failed to give a frank answer about who is responsible for “the dog attack” on the Palestinian woman Yusra Sbeih Rabay’a, of Al-Ubeidiya village on Wednesday.

The forces raided Al-Ubeidiya on Wednesday morning, searching for Yusra’s brother, Daoud Sbeih Rabay’a, who is believed to be a member of the Fatah military wing Al-Aqsa Brigades. With 25 military vehicles and bulldozers, the Israeli Army besieged the Rabay’a family houses and demolished part of it. During the Israeli Army siege, which lasted over seven hours, one of the police dogs attacked Yusra.

However, according to the story recounted by the military spokesman, the Israeli soldiers are “innocent” of giving orders to the dog to attack Yusra. Rather, Yusra had approached the soldiers and failed to obey their orders. According to the army’s story, “during the operation, the citizen (Yusra) Rabay’a got near to the soldiers and refused to leave the area, which led to the result that she was attacked by the dog, that bit her in her right hand before the soldiers intervened to rescue her from the dog’s teeth.”

Despite the fact that the soldiers expressed regret for the attack, the content of the story justifies “the dog’s action” and clarified that Yusra is the one responsible, because she was in a place that she should not have been in. Furthermore, the army clears the dog of responsibility because it was “doing its duty” and defending the soldiers.

Consequently, the dog carried out its instructions without obtaining permission.

However, what cannot be denied or proven is whether Yusra is the one who initiated the incident, and forced the dog to bite her hand. Did she really put her hand between the teeth of the “innocent” dog, as would be understood by the incredulous Israeli story of the incident?


Full Story

Current IssuesMarch 15, 2007 11:29 am

PROTEST THE ENGLAND vs ISRAEL EURO 2008 MATCH ON MARCH 24th 2007

Outside the Football Association HQ, Soho Square, London (map at www.bigcampaign.org )

picketing the FA HQ from 1pm on Saturday March 24th over England’s Euro 2008 Qualifier against Israel.

The Boycott Israeli Goods Campaign calls for a sporting boycott of Apartheid Israel until Israel complies with international humanitarian law.

Football shirts in the Palestine colours can be purchased from Friends of Al-Aqsa for 5 each. Various sizes are available and if demonstrators are wearing these, the picket will be all the more effective. Contact info@aqsa.org.uk to place orders.


Chest sizes available: 30,32,36,42 and 44

FOOTBALL ACTION ALERT

Write to the Football Association to complain about Israel’s inclusion in Euro 2008 and England’s qualifier match with Israel in Tel Aviv on the 23rd March: Football Association, 25 Soho Square, London W1D 4FA.

Complain to the FA at info@thefa.com or call them on 02077454999. You could copy in UEFA at info@euro2008.com

Please also write to Kick Racism out of Football about the inclusion of Apartheid Israel in Euro 2008 while Palestinian footballers are excluded from international football. Email them at www.kickitout.org or email their chairman Lord Herman Ouseley at hermanouseley@aol.com

Please email boycott@palestinecampaign.org to let us know if you receive a reply

More info on sports boycott and on the repression of Palestinian international football:

Sport boycott as a Political Weapon - India ENews
http://www.pacbi.org/boycottnewsmore.php?id=428010M27

PA Football Team Unable to reach the Asian Cup qualifier because of Israeli Gaza travel ban - Haaretz http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/788528.html

Website of Goal Dreams - a Film about Palestine’s national football team http://www.goaldreams.com/

Palestine’s Football Pride - BBC Online
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3834193.stm

Activists plan to Kick Israeli Apartheid Out of Football - Stop the Wall http://stopthewall.org/worldwideactivism/1138.shtml

Allaa Shahine Reports on Arab Calls to Kick Israel out of International Football Organisations - Al Ahram http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2002/582/sp2.htm

Last Summer the campaign for a sporting boycott of Apartheid Israel gathered momentum after Israel’s bombing of Lebanon. In July a large pickett was held outside the Davis Cup Israel-Britain tennis tournament in Eastbourne. On the 3rd August a planned Israel-Scotland cricket match was cancelled after protests were announced. Protests have taken place over Arsenal’s sponsorship deal with Israel.

The sporting boycott was an integral tool in the movement against South African Apartheid and can be used effectively to highlight Israeli apartheid. Sporting boycott actions often receive significant media attention in the UK, Israel and Palestine.

For more information please visit www.bigcampaign.org

For my readers, i have purchased 2 Tshirts, and will be asking you guys to write in to win them, so watch this space, and please do join me and my daughter at the protest!  

Current IssuesFebruary 18, 2007 1:02 pm



Alison Weir, a California journalist and activist who chronicles the bias in U.S. media coverage of Middle East events, bestirred many Americans—perhaps many thousands—in early October with a powerful, chilling Internet account of the largely unreported murder of a Palestinian mother of 11 children by Israeli soldiers in Gaza.

Itemad Ismail Abu Mo’ammar was fatally shot while trying to rescue her deaf husband from a severe beating by Israeli soldiers, who were furious because he did not answer their questions.

Weir wrote:

“Foolishly or valiantly, how is one to say, the 35-year-old woman interfered. She tried to explain that her husband was deaf and couldn’t hear their questions. Then she attempted to stop them from hitting him. So they shot her. Several times. She didn’t die, though. That took longer, because the soldiers refused to allow an ambulance to transport her to a physician. Finally, after approximately five hours, one was permitted to take her to a hospital where physicians were able to render one service: pronounce her dead. Why did this all happen? The family lived behind the residence of a resistance fighter wanted by Israel. The death of Itemad was simply ‘collateral damage’ in a failed Israeli assassination-kidnapping operation.”

Weir searched major U.S. media—broadcast and print—from coast to coast, and found Itemad’s death reported in only three newspapers, a single-sentence notice in each. One of the three, The Washington Post, reported inaccurately that the woman was killed by an Israeli tank round. After exchanging messages with Weir, the Post cleared for publication her letter that explained that multiple bullets, fired close up—not a tank round—were the cause of death. But the Post reneged. The letter was not published. Why? Weir’s explanation: “After all, these were only Palestinians, and it was just another mother dead.”

Ponder the “why” of the shooting. Although the distraught woman struggled to get the armed soldiers to stop beating her deaf husband, she surely posed no physical threat to them. Even if they did not understand what she said, she was, at worst, an inconvenience, hardly deserving to be shot.

Now consider the “why” of the aftermath. Were the hearts of the Israeli squad so hardened that they could not act with compassion as the husband and children watched helplessly through unavailing tears as the woman bled to death? Why did they want her dead?

This Gaza atrocity is not an isolated aberration. Israeli brutality is commonplace, and so is American silence in response. What transformed the soldiers, their military superiors, as well as the civilian leaders of the Israeli government into callous brutes? Is the whole Israeli governmental system so corrupted with anti-Arab passion that mercy for a dying mother is nowhere to be found?

Other questions beg answers. Will the killers be punished or even rebuked? Will messages of regret, consolation, and—yes—compensation be sent to the survivors? Sadly, I know from the wells of memory the answer to these two questions is no.

Such messages should come from Washington, not just from Israel, as the guns and bullets used in the killing were almost certainly gifts of the U.S. government. Will the U.S. ambassador deliver messages to the aggrieved, as well as a threatening protest to Israeli officials, demanding an end to the brutal treatment of innocent people? Here again, the answer is no.

Why the cover-up in major U.S. media? The awful circumstances of Itemad’s death were not reported, because major media are afraid—yes, afraid—to feature Israeli criminal behavior. Israel’s influence is suffocating. Imagine the intense, sustained coverage that would have dominated major media if the roles in Gaza had been reversed, with a dying Israeli woman denied medical service for hours by Palestinians who had shot her at close range for no good reason.

U.S. media are generally brave, except where Israel is concerned. So are members of Congress. So is the presidency. And the rest of us? Almost everyone is afraid to criticize Israel, no matter how barbaric its behavior.

U.S. silence in the face of an Israeli atrocity is a green light to more crime. If we look at our own hands, we may find a trace of Itemad’s blood right there in plain sight.

Ramallah Online 




Current Issues 12:43 pm



London Mayor Ken Livingstone attacked the Daily Mail newspaper on Sunday after a columnist appeared to endorse letter bombing offices connected with the congestion charge.

Populist ranter Richard Littlejohn wrote in Friday’s edition of the newspaper: "Be honest, until you heard that a woman had been injured, how many of you suppressed a cheer at the news that someone had sent a letter bomb to the company which runs London’s congestion charge?

"Even after we learnt that two men were treated for blast injuries, I’ll bet that there were still plenty of motorists who thought: ‘Serves the bastards right’."

Police are probing seven mail bomb attacks on businesses since January 18 – three of which took place last week.

Although Mr Littlejohn insisted that protests that harm others can never be justified, Mr Livingstone branded the Daily Mail "foolish and irresponsible" for printing the column.

"He has sought to legitimise the idea that it was normal to cheer the bombing of the offices of a company managing the congestion charge. His whole column is dangerous and stupid," said the mayor. "The Daily Mail give Richard Littlejohn a big cheque for writing his column, but they shouldn’t give him a blank one."

Green London Assembly member Jenny Jones added: "If a Muslim publication had printed similar inflammatory remarks about an international issue, there would be a huge outcry. Littlejohn’s hypocrisy is stunning."